← Back

Five Year Follow-Up of Heroic Anterior Tooth Save:UPDATE

Terry Pannkuk, DDS, MScDDiagnostic Puzzles, Complications: Advanced Management, Fractured Roots, Surgical Retreatment, Retreatment Strategies, Dismantling, Gutta Percha Removal, Recall Observations, Sample Cases, All by Date

Description

Preoperative periapical radiograph (4/11/2014)

Description

Preoperative radiograph (horizontal angle, 4/11/2014)

Description

Initial access into the coronal composite core (4/24/2014)

Description

Initial access into the coronal portion of the post (4/24/2014)

Description

Staging of the coronal portion of the post without removing peripheral dentin (4/24/2014)

Description

First penetration into the center of the post with a small Munce bur (4/24/2014)

Description

More apical penetration into the post without removing dentin (4/24/2014)

Description

A yet deeper penetration with the apical cement becoming visible (4/24/2014)

Description

Note the thin shell of metal at the lingual (4/24/2014)

Description

Apical penetration into the post starts to reveal the labial area of gutta percha filling (4/24/2014)

Description

Note the labial area of gutta percha into the previously treated surgical reverse-prep (4/24/2014)

Description

Note the apical post left with lingual composite and labial gutta percha visible (4/24/2014)

Description

Continued apical post penetration without peripheral dentin removal (4/24/2014)

Description

Completed post removal with shredded gutta percha filling the reverse-prep (4/24/2014)

Description

De-bonded coronal composite core (4/24/2014)

Description

Completed cleaning and shaping before calcium hydroxide placement (4/24/2014)

Description

Placement of calcium hydroxide (4/24/2014)

Description

After removal of the rubber dam a stream of calcium hydroxide was noted exiting the fistula (4/24/2014)

Description

Removal of the temporary crown and Cavit filling at the beginning of the second treatment visit (June 5, 2014)

Description

An apically propagated crack line was noted in the apical third (June 5, 2014

Description

Ultrasonic file used to prepare the apical root crack

Description

Microscopic view of the apical crack prepared with the ultrasonic file (June 5, 2014)

Description

Final cleaning of the root canal preparation before filling (June 5, 2014)

Description

Placement of Biodentine (June 5, 2014)

Description

Geristore (resin modified glass ionomer) placed over the set Biodentine (June 5, 2014)

Description

Immediate post-treatment radiograph (June 5, 2014)

Description

CBCT 3-D rendering highlighting the severely beveled root-end preparation (June 5, 2014)

Description

CBCT Saggital plane capture showing the Biodentine layer (similar radiolucency to natural dentin), then the Geristore layer, then space, and then Cavit sealing the coronal access prep (June 5, 2014)

Description

CBCT frontal plane capture (June 5, 2014)

Description

CBCT transverse plane capture showing the aggressively beveled and prepared root end (June 5, 2014)

Description

Clinical microphoto taken one month after endodontic treatment was completed (July 9, 2014)

Description

Periapical recall radiograph taken at 6 months (January 9, 2015)

Description

Clinical microphoto showing the final restorative result at the 6 month recall examination (January 9, 2015)

Description

Clinical microphoto (lingual view) showing the final restorative result at the 6 month recall examination (January 9, 2015)

Description

1 year recall examination showing the palatal tissues with excellent periodontal healing (July 7, 2015)

Description

1 year recall examination showing excellent tissue healing and esthetics (July 7, 2015)

Description

1 year periapical radiograph presenting within normal limits with no evidence of recurrent pathosis (July 7, 2015)

Description

4 year periapical radiograph taken when the patient returned with periapical swelling over tooth #9 (October 9, 2018)

Description

CBCT saggital section capture shows a periapical radiolucency over the root of tooth #9 (October 9, 2018)

Description

CBCT transverse section capture shows a periapical radiolucency over the root of tooth #9 with loss of the labial cortical plate (October 9, 2018)

Description

Injection of the periapical lesion with trichloroacetic acid to dehydrate and facilitate removal (October 17, 2018)

Description

Apical resection of the cracked portion of the root (October 17, 2018)

Description

Completed micropreparation of the root end (October 17, 2018)

Description

Filling of the microprep with EndoSequence bioceramic putty (October 17, 2018)

Description

Immediate post-surgical periapical radiograph showing the reverse-filled root end (October 17, 2018)

Description

Flap closure with Vicryl microsutures (October 17, 2018).

Description

One year post-surgical recall microphotograph showing excellent gingival health and healing. (November 12, 2019)

Description

A dual arch CBCT scan was taken and demonstrated complete osseous regeneration of the surgical site (November 12, 2019)

«
»
Prev 1 Next

Patient: 52 year-old (2014) male in excellent health

Chief Complaint: Patient reported a bump on the gums above his front upper tooth

Dental History: Patient reported a history of prior orthodontics as a child and previous endodontic treatment performed on the maxillary left and right central incisors in 1970 (teeth #’s 8 and 9). Surgical endodontic treatment had been performed years ago after a recurrent infection associated with the maxillary left central incisor (tooth #9)

Significant Findings (teeth #’s 8 and 9): Percussion and palpation tests were within normal limits for both teeth. Periodontal probing depths were within normal limits for both teeth. A fistula with drainage was noted at the apical extent of the attached gingiva opposite tooth #9. Radiographic findings revealed slight periodontal ligament space widening with a slightly short root canal filling associated with tooth #8.

Tooth #9 revealed a diffuse periapical radiolucency with a root filling filled 2-3 mm short of the radiographic terminus and a suspected “blunderbuss” apex.

Pulp and Periradicular Diagnosis: Previous root canal fillings (teeth #’s 8 and 9) with a questionable periapical status (tooth #8) and a chronic periradicular periodontitis with a draining fistula (tooth #9)

Treatment Prognosis: Good (tooth #8), Fair (tooth #9)

Treatment Plan: Nonsurgical endodontic retreatment (tooth #8), Nonsurgical endodontic retreatment with post removal (tooth #9)

Special Considerations of Performed Treatment: It is not uncommon to encounter surprise complexities after beginning nonsurgical endodontic retreatment. Teeth having previously placed posts and prior attempts at retreatment (especially surgical) are higher risk that teeth that had been previously treated without posts and without follow-up endodontic surgery. If a prior retreatment attempt had failed the prognosis for treatment success on another attempt is less favorable. If there is an obvious previous treatment error that can be corrected then the prognosis for retreatment is more favorable than a case which appears to have been previously performed with expertise.

In this case the previous endodontic treatment performed on the right maxillary central incisor (tooth #8) was suspect but not obviously failing. The left maxillary central incisor (tooth #9) appeared to be high risk with a poorer prognosis because there were no obvious treatment errors observed with the examination findings and there had been a previous surgical endodontic retreatment attempt. Tooth #9 was obviously failing with recurrent endodontic pathosis evidenced by a draining fistula.

This case will be divided into two parts as it presents interesting questions to be answered as a “puzzle case”:

April 24, 2014: The first visit of retreatment in two steps was performed on both teeth #’s 8 and 9.

Tooth #8: Removal of the previous root canal filling material in the root was uneventful, cleaning, shaping, and placement of intracanal calcium hydroxide was routine.

Tooth #9: Note the sequence of images showing the author’s “staging and penetration” technique used to remove the cast metal post in tooth #9. Once the post was removed there was a noticeably large accumulation of gutta percha inadequately sealing the reverse-prepared labial aspect of the root.

Meticulous debridement of debris was performed with copious flushing of sodium hypochlorite. A retentive composite build-up portion of the crown de-bonded and was removed. Calcium hydroxide was placed, the canal orifice sealed with Cavit, and the temporary crown recemented with Duralon cement. When the rubber dam was removed calcium hydroxide could be seen streaming out the draining fistula.

May 27, 2014: A short examination appointment was scheduled to verify that he fistula had healed (it had) and the second treatment appointment was scheduled to obturate both teeth #’s 8 and 9.

June 5, 2014:

Tooth #8: Obturation and completion of endodontic retreatment was uneventful and an apical demonstrably filled lateral canal was noted.

Tooth #9: The temporary crown and temporary core were removed. Once the root canal system was cleared of calcium hydroxide and dried, an apically propagated crack was noted upon microscopic examination!

A treatment puzzle was then presented:
What would you do next?

June 5, 2014

The clinician has to be prepared to change a treatment plan based upon new findings. In this case the patient was informed of the crack and the prosthodontist treating the case was called. The patient was highly motivated to save the tooth and accepted the risks (the tooth was reassessed as having a guarded prognosis). The crack was microscopically prepared with an ultrasonic file, and the irregular root canal space filled to the bleeding point with Biodentine (tricalcium silicate with enhanced physical properties). A layer of Geristore was placed over the coronal surface of the Biodentine. After curing of the Geristore a Cavit filling was placed in the access and the crown was recemented with Duralon. The patient was referred back to his dentist (prosthodontist) for a build-up and new provisional crown.

Recall:

July 9, 2014: The patient returned for a one month follow-up showing excellent gingival health and no signs of clinical disease. The prosthodontist was monitoring the stability for a slight period longer before definitive restoration.

January 9, 2015: At the 6 month recall examination visit the patient presented without symptoms and no signs or recurrent endodontic pathosis. The periodontal tissues appeared be healthy with normal sulcular probing depths. The restoration of both teeth #’s 8 and 9 had been completed a few months earlier and the patient was very satisfied with the aesthetics.

July 7, 2015: At the 1 year recall examination visit the patient presented without symptoms and no signs or recurrent endodontic pathosis. The periodontal tissues appeared be healthy with normal sulcular probing depths. The patient was very satisfied with the result.

October 9, 2018: 4 years after treatment the patient returned with swelling at the periapex of the maxillary left central incisor (#9). The CBCT revealed a periapical radiolucency with the loss of the labial cortical plate at the apex. The periodontal probing depths were within normal limits. The previous retreated right central incisor (#8) was fully healed with unremarkable findings. The diagnosis was determined to be recurrent endodontic pathosis, probably related to the previously detected apically propagated root crack, ineffectual definitive root space debridement, and a failed root seal. Surgical endodontic retreatment with a guarded prognosis was proposed.

October 17, 2018: A submarginal dual release surgical flap was made. A periapical lesion was enucleated and removed. The root end was resected, prepared and filled with EndoSequence bioceramic putty, the flap was replaced, and sutured with Vicryl sutures.

November 12, 2019: the patient returned for a 1 year post-surgical recall examination and the site had fully healed with a CBCT taken to show complete osseous regeneration. The patient was asymptomatic and very happy with the endodontic result and restorative aesthetics. A 5 year post-surgical recall exam is planned.

Key Learning Points:

1. Surgical revision treatments may be required for heroic endodontic retreatment cases with multiple complexities. If the patient is fully informed, accepting, and compliant, even the most compromised teeth can be successfully maintained in stable health, proper function, and with ideal aesthetics.

  1. Retreating previously performed endodontic procedures often results in mid-treatment surprise complexities.

  2. Patients should be prepared for new decision points at the initial examination before treatment.

  3. Long term provisionalization is a prudent way to insure an early failure will not compromise the definitive restoration.

  4. Apically propagated root fractures are a common complexity found with microscope inspection of roots having posts and significant build-ups. Direct line endodontic access is important for discovery of complications in the apical third of roots.

  5. Biodentine offers favorable strength, sealing, and biocompatibility features for use in severally compromised roots requiring a large volume of filling material. In smaller irregular areas requiring “flow” a bioceramic material such as EndoSequence would be more suitable.

  6. Micropreparation of cracks with an ultrasonic file minimizes critical root dentin removal and effectively cleans crypts.

  7. Thoughtfully scheduling phased recall exams customized to the unique complexity treated not only allows immediate correction of any noticeable problems but also educates the clinician about outcome “cause and effect” of a myriad of complex clinical complications.

Join the discussion

You must log in or create a free account to post a comment.